New Framework Sets Common Yardstick for Housing

Renters and buyers across Europe may eventually see social outcomes compared more consistently as the sector adopts a shared measurement standard.

Updated on Nov. 3, 2026 in Apartments

Bold flat-color economist-style illustration of a row of stepped cream and slate volumes topped with upright brass measuring rules on an oxblood field.
Urban Land Institute Europe has released a framework giving developers, investors and housing providers a shared standard for measuring the social impact of residential projects. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Urban Land Institute Europe has launched a report and an accompanying framework for measuring the social impact of residential real estate. The work is aimed at developers, investors and housing providers across the sector, which currently lacks a consistent way to measure housing outcomes.

Why it matters

Without a shared yardstick, housing outcomes such as affordability, quality and community effects are often not measured consistently, making it hard for households and policymakers to compare projects. A common framework gives the sector a way to assess and benchmark social impact across the residential lifecycle.

Just 22 per cent of nearly 200 European industry professionals surveyed have an established social impact measurement strategy, while 65 per cent are still experimenting and 7 per cent have no formal approach. The report draws on more than 40 major research studies and interviews across six countries.

The players

Urban Land Institute Europe

The European arm of the Urban Land Institute, a research body whose frameworks guide how developers and investors evaluate residential projects.

CBRE Investment Management

A major real estate investment manager whose residential portfolios shape the rents and housing conditions faced by many households.

Hines

An international real estate developer and investment firm whose residential projects affect housing supply and tenant costs.

MOME Living

A residential operator whose rental and co-living properties determine the terms and quality that renters encounter.

The details

The report was built from a review of more than 40 research studies, a pan-European survey of nearly 200 industry professionals, interviews across six countries, and case studies from Belgium, France and Germany. A steering committee of practitioners from firms including CBRE Investment Management, Hines and MOME Living guided the work. The resulting framework is designed to give residential projects a common method for assessing, comparing and benchmarking social impact over their full lifecycle.

Timeline

  1. - The report and framework were launched on 3 November 2026.

Money Landscape

Measuring social impact sits alongside a long-running shift in real estate toward standardized performance metrics, which has so far focused more on financial and environmental outcomes. Housing affordability pressures across Europe, including large-scale protests in Spain cited in the source, are bringing social outcomes into sharper focus for the sector.

If you rent or are considering a residential purchase in Europe, a clearer social impact standard may eventually shape the quality, community features and long-term costs of the projects you encounter. The practical effect is still developing, so it is worth comparing the terms and conditions of any apartment you consider.

The takeaway

The sector still lacks a consistent way to measure housing's social outcomes, so there is no single benchmark yet to judge a building against. When evaluating a residential project, ask the developer or operator what outcomes they measure and how.

Further reading

For broader context on rental housing and building-level costs, see the Apartments section.

More information

Download the ULI social impact report and framework from Urban Land Institute Europe.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Urban Land.