U.S. Bank Objected to Race Discrimination Lawsuit Ruling

The bank is fighting to dismiss a lawsuit brought by a former employee regarding the timing of his discrimination claim.

Updated on Sept. 20, 2026 in Banking

U.S. Bank Objected to Race Discrimination Lawsuit Ruling

Live Poll

Do you believe the court system provides fair opportunities for employees to resolve workplace discrimination claims?

U.S. Bank filed an objection to a magistrate judge’s recommendation that a race-discrimination lawsuit filed by former employee Srini Nallasivan be allowed to proceed. The bank argues that Nallasivan failed to meet filing deadlines for his EEOC charge.

Why it matters

The bank seeks to reverse a recommendation from U.S. Magistrate Judge David Keesler, who had suggested that the discrimination claim move forward while recommending the dismissal of defamation and blacklisting claims.

U.S. Bank argues that the discrimination charge was filed more than 100 days past the required deadline. The legal dispute follows the elimination of the plaintiff's position in early 2024.

The players

U.S. Bank

A national financial institution providing consumer banking, lending, and credit products.

Srini Nallasivan

A former U.S. Bank employee who filed a race-discrimination lawsuit against the institution.

David Keesler

A U.S. Magistrate Judge in the Western District of North Carolina overseeing the procedural recommendations of the lawsuit.

The details

In a filing with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, U.S. Bank requested that the judge's August recommendation to allow the suit be overturned. The bank contends that Srini Nallasivan missed the window for filing an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charge relative to when he was notified of his job elimination. The case originated after Nallasivan, who joined the bank in 2018, separated from the company in March 2024 and completed transition work in May 2024.

2018: Srini Nallasivan joined U.S. Bank.
January 30, 2024: Nallasivan was notified of his position elimination.
May 21, 2024: Nallasivan finished his transition work.
November 2024: Nallasivan filed his EEOC charge.
August 27, 2026: The magistrate recommended the discrimination claim proceed.

Money Landscape

This case highlights the strict adherence to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filing deadlines in employment litigation. Determining when the clock starts on such claims remains a key point of contention in workplace separation disputes.

This dispute centers on the critical timing requirements for reporting workplace grievances, which can affect the viability of legal claims for displaced employees. Households managing a job transition should consult with a qualified professional to understand the specific deadlines for filing official complaints.

The takeaway

Employment discrimination claims require strict compliance with administrative filing windows to remain valid. Employees facing job elimination should keep thorough records of all separation dates and notification timelines to discuss with legal or human resources professionals.