Florida Court Halved Insurance Attorney Fee Award
The appellate ruling cut a $250,160 legal fee to $125,080, impacting how courts calculate costs for property insurance disputes.
Updated on Oct. 12, 2026 in Insurance
Live Poll
Should courts strictly limit the use of extra contingency fee multipliers in insurance legal disputes?
The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal has reversed a contingency fee multiplier in a property insurance case, resulting in a reduction of the total attorney fee award from $250,160 to $125,080. This decision marks a significant shift in how courts evaluate the necessity of fee multipliers in insurance litigation for Florida residents.
Why it matters
The court found that there was no evidence demonstrating that the policyholders could not afford traditional legal representation or that such a multiplier was required to secure counsel. This ruling limits the application of fee multipliers and clarifies the evidentiary requirements for these payments in property insurance disputes.
The appellate court reduced the total attorney fee award from $250,160 to $125,080 after determining a 2.0 contingency fee multiplier was unjustified. This adjustment follows a review of the evidentiary standards required to award additional fees beyond standard hourly or retainer costs.
The players
Security First Insurance Company
A property insurance provider operating in Florida whose policyholders were involved in the court case.
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
The judicial body that reviewed the case and ultimately reversed the application of the contingency fee multiplier.
The details
The appellate court applied the Standard Guaranty Insurance v. Quanstrom framework to review the trial court's original decision. Because the expert witness failed to prove that the market necessitated a multiplier to attract competent counsel, the court determined the original award was unsupported. The ruling ensures that fee multipliers are only applied when there is clear evidence that claimants would otherwise be unable to secure necessary legal representation.
Timeline
Legislature amended section 57.104 of the Florida Statutes in 2023.
The Fifth District Court of Appeal issued the ruling on October 9, 2026.
Money Landscape
This decision marks a departure from the historical application of contingency fee multipliers under Section 627.428 of the Florida Statutes. It aligns with a tightening of legal costs as the state seeks to manage property insurance litigation expenses.
If you are involved in a property insurance dispute, this ruling highlights the necessity of providing concrete evidence regarding legal affordability when seeking fee adjustments. Policyholders should consult with a qualified legal professional to understand how current court standards may affect the cost and strategy of potential litigation.
The takeaway
The appellate court has reinforced a higher standard of proof for attorneys seeking fee multipliers in property insurance cases. Homeowners in the middle of a claim dispute should discuss with their legal counsel whether their case meets the evidentiary threshold for requested fee structures.
Further reading
For more on managing policy costs, see our section on Insurance.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Insurance Business.
Live Poll
Should courts strictly limit the use of extra contingency fee multipliers in insurance legal disputes?
