Investors Urged to Demand Broader Catastrophe Risk Data
Investors in insurance-linked securities are encouraged to request more risk models in deal documents to improve financial certainty.
Updated on Oct. 13, 2026 in Investing
Live Poll
Do you believe investors should demand more transparent and varied data when evaluating financial risk?
Karen Clark, CEO of Karen Clark & Company, recently called for investors to push for multiple risk model views within insurance-linked securities (ILS) deal documentation. This move aims to provide stakeholders with more comprehensive data when evaluating catastrophe bond offerings.
Why it matters
By relying on a single vendor model, capital allocation decisions may face higher levels of uncertainty and limited competition in risk assessment. Incorporating alternative perspectives allows for more robust underwriting and pricing, helping to better inform household financial planning related to insurance investments.
Current ILS deal flow typically relies on single primary vendor models, a standard that industry experts suggest lacks competition. Increased usage of alternative risk models is intended to reduce uncertainty for capital allocation decisions.
The players
Karen Clark
The CEO and co-founder of Karen Clark & Company who provides expertise on catastrophe risk modeling services.
Karen Clark & Company
A catastrophe risk modeling firm that provides data used by insurers for pricing, underwriting, and reinsurance.
The details
Transaction documentation for catastrophe bonds currently dictates which risk models are utilized for analysis, often excluding alternative views. Investors can influence this process by specifically requesting that deal managers and brokers include multiple model perspectives in offering documents. This shift is designed to provide investors with broader data sets for internal rate making, pricing, and underwriting.
Timeline
October 13, 2026: Karen Clark addressed the ILS Bermuda Convergence 2026 conference regarding risk modeling.
Money Landscape
This development marks a potential departure from the long-standing industry reliance on single-source models in insurance-linked securities. It follows a historical pattern where market participants gradually shift toward more diverse data sets as modeling capabilities advance.
For investors active in insurance-linked securities, this trend highlights the importance of reviewing the technical documentation provided in deal offerings. If you hold or are considering these assets, discuss the transparency and modeling methodologies with a qualified financial professional.
The takeaway
The move toward incorporating multiple risk perspectives reflects a broader effort to reduce uncertainty in high-stakes financial deals. Investors should remain attentive to the disclosure documents of their holdings and discuss the impact of risk modeling choices with a professional advisor.
Further reading
For more on managing risk and understanding market trends, explore our Investing section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Artemis.bm - The Catastrophe Bond, Insurance Linked Securities & Investment, Reinsurance Capital, Alternative Risk Transfer and Weather Risk Management site.
Live Poll
Do you believe investors should demand more transparent and varied data when evaluating financial risk?
