NAR Commission Settlement Upheld After Court Denies Appeals

Homebuyers and sellers should prepare for a landscape where commission practices remain bound by the finalized settlement terms.

Updated on Sept. 28, 2026 in Residential

Bold flat-color editorial illustration featuring stylized brass keys on a wooden base, representing finalized real estate commission regulations.
The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals has finalized the National Association of Realtors' $1.02 billion commission settlement, effectively ending years of legal challenges. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Do you believe major real estate commission settlements serve the best interests of the public?

The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals has denied final requests for rehearing, keeping the National Association of Realtors' commission settlement intact. This decision concludes legal challenges from objectors and maintains the terms governing real estate commissions nationwide.

Why it matters

The ruling secures the framework for a $1.02 billion settlement pool, preventing further delays in the implementation of industry-wide changes. It provides certainty for households regarding the regulatory environment governing future real estate transactions.

The total settlement pool stands at $1.02 billion, which includes $110.6 million in settlements from firms such as Compass and Redfin. This follows the court's rejection of various challenges to the legal agreements.

The players

National Association of Realtors

A national trade association that sets industry standards and ethics for real estate agents representing home sellers and buyers.

8th Circuit Court of Appeals

The federal appellate court that provides legal oversight and final rulings on regional and national litigation.

Compass

A national real estate brokerage firm that provides listing and buying services and manages transaction commission structures.

Redfin

A residential real estate brokerage and technology company that facilitates home sales and tracks market commission data.

The details

The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a two-page order that officially closed the door on panel and en banc rehearings. By citing the reasoning from its August 19 ruling, the court affirmed that the merits of the objectors' concerns had already been fully addressed. This action finalizes the legal standing of the Sitzer | Burnett settlements and related cases for parties across the country.

Timeline

  1. Appeals were argued before the 8th Circuit panel in January 2026.

  2. The court affirmed the Sitzer | Burnett settlements on August 19, 2026.

  3. The court upheld the Gibson case settlements on September 1, 2026.

  4. Three additional objector appeals were rejected on September 15, 2026.

  5. The court denied rehearing requests from Friedman and March on September 24, 2026.

Money Landscape

The court's denial of rehearing requests follows the precedent established by the Sitzer | Burnett settlements, solidifying the new rules for industry commission practices. This ruling effectively maintains the status quo in a multi-billion dollar shift that continues to reshape residential home buying.

Homebuyers and sellers should remain aware that the industry-wide commission reforms are now firmly established. If you are entering the market, consult with a qualified professional to understand how these commission structures may influence your closing costs.

The takeaway

The court has finalized the legal standing of the major commission settlements, ending this phase of appellate litigation. Prospective homeowners should view these established rules as the new standard for evaluating agent fees when negotiating real estate contracts.

Further reading

For more information on how recent changes affect your transaction, see the Residential section.

Live Poll

Do you believe major real estate commission settlements serve the best interests of the public?