Court Heard Arguments on Video Privacy Lawsuit

The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals is considering if real estate websites must comply with federal video privacy rules.

Updated on Sept. 23, 2026 in Apartments

Isometric editorial illustration of a sealed legal envelope and a server tower, representing the intersection of privacy law and digital data platforms.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is reviewing whether real estate websites must adhere to federal video privacy laws after a lawsuit challenged data disclosure practices. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should digital platforms be held strictly liable for sharing user viewing data with third parties?

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit heard oral arguments in a lawsuit brought by Desmond Banks against CoStar Realty Information Inc. regarding its Apartments.com website. The case centers on whether the platform qualifies as a video tape service provider under the Video Privacy Protection Act.

Why it matters

The lawsuit alleges that the company disclosed consumer data linking users to watched videos to third parties without authorization. If the court finds the company is subject to the act, it could change how property platforms manage and disclose user viewing data.

A lower court previously dismissed the case, determining the platform did not meet the definition of a video tape service provider. The current appeal seeks to overturn this ruling and apply liability under the Video Privacy Protection Act.

The players

Desmond Banks

The plaintiff who initiated the lawsuit against the apartment listing platform.

CoStar Realty Information Inc.

The parent company of Apartments.com, an online portal for listing and searching rental properties.

The details

The plaintiff argued that delivering marketing videos via the website exposes the company to legal liability under the Video Privacy Protection Act. The case originated from allegations that the platform shared data linking specific users to the videos they watched with third-party entities. The appellate court is now reviewing the previous dismissal to determine if the platform functions as a regulated video service provider.

Timeline

  1. September 23, 2026: The federal appeals court held oral arguments for the case.

Money Landscape

This case sits at the intersection of consumer digital privacy rights and the expanding scope of the Video Privacy Protection Act. It highlights a broadening effort to apply legacy privacy statutes to modern online marketing practices across various industries.

Users of real estate platforms should monitor how these sites handle data sharing and privacy settings as legal standards evolve. If you are concerned about your digital footprint, consult with a qualified professional to understand your rights regarding data privacy.

The takeaway

The appellate court review could redefine how online listing platforms collect and share user engagement data. Keep an eye on future privacy policy updates from the services you use to stay informed about how your interaction data is being managed.

Further reading

For more on the industry, see our Apartments section.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Bloomberglaw.

Live Poll

Should digital platforms be held strictly liable for sharing user viewing data with third parties?